There are any number of studio music teachers who are embracing the technology to teach online, via Skype or a Youtube subscription series, and probably more ways that I don’t know about. I do applaud those who are seeking to earn a decent living in a profession where this is difficult. I admire the entrepreneurial spirit, admittedly pretty foreign to me.
Music lessons via YouTube is working well for some. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal, titled “In the Future, Who Will Need Teachers?” recounts the success of a guitar teacher in Nashville “who uses a series of free YouTube videos and live lessons via webcam to draw students to his $40 monthly subscription plan. Today he has 170 subscribers.” That’s $6800/month. It would be interesting to know how much time he spends on this.
Guitar lessons have always been in a bit of a different category, though. You can walk into a music store and buy 4 lessons. It’s not the same long-term, get-them-while-they’re-young, instill-a-lifelong-appreciation thing that most of us do. Sign up with me and you’re stuck with me for the year. Live and in real-time.
Learning to play an instrument well is physical. I need to touch muscles in arms and shoulders and fingers. Students need to feel my arm weight when I’m supporting it with a single finger.* Tension and pain hampers a lot of enthusiasm and progress.
It’s also mental. The argument is out there that kids are different today because of the technology that is an ubiquitous part of their lives.** That they can’t focus the same way anymore. That we somehow need to compete for their attention. That learning old-fashioned music the old-fashioned (time-tested) way doesn’t cut it anymore.
What I see is that over the weeks and months these students do learn to settle in and focus. A whole new world of sound is opened up to them. Subtle sounds and differences and feelings that are best experienced live. I see it when their arms start moving toward the top of the phrase. I see it in their faces when I demonstrate the beauty and unexpectedness of the deceptive cadence. They get that the music should have ended but didn’t.
And it’s emotional. It’s the building of a relationship – the only one-on-one attention of a non-parent adult that most kids receive. Our influence can be enormous. They are beautiful human beings.
I don’t believe that the traditional music teacher is in danger of becoming obsolete. There are large populations who still value music instruction for their children and still believe that private tuition is the best way to receive it.
That we could potentially be replaced should be seen as a wake-up call, however. It should be motivation for us to hone our craft, always increase our knowledge, and provide as high a quality of education as we can.
The article from the Wall Street Journal is worth reading. Click here. Thank you David.
Image: via I Like Pianos.
*In today’s climate we need to be very careful here – a completely open door policy is the best way to prevent future issues.
**You won’t see any posts about any Apps on this blog, for the simple reason that I don’t own an iAnything. I’m not opposed – just not going there. I’m always thrilled when my students let me know about the great Apps they have found.
Related articles
- Music Changed My Mind (thechangeblog.com)
- The Fun Factor (ladonasmusicstudio.com)

I am so glad to have read your words. I certainly not as diplomatic as you are about this type of instruction. Teachers of quality are loosing the battle quickly. You can’t compete with the notion that parents won’t even have to actually leave the house to give their kids lessons. Now if they could just learn dance and karate online, the parents would never have to DO ANYTHING!
Laughing. Thank you for your comment, Suzanne. I’m not nearly as diplomatic in person as in print!
I have to remind myself that probably not all teachers have it as good as I do regarding the demographics of the area in which I live. It’s not been a problem for me but I desperately hope the desire for private, live teachers will continue.
Pingback: In Defence of the Live Teacher | LaDona's Music Studio | Studio News
Ladona, nice and interesting topic. The potential revenue is attractive for offering piano instruction online. I’m computer tech fluent too, so it’s tempting–but honestly, I think the highest quality of instruction can’t be beaten by the live, in person connection. As you alluded to, the physical touch is sometimes necessary. Right from the first basic “touch-play” technique, I always like to demonstrate this while playing on the student’s forearm…showing the different between proper articulation from the main, first knuckle, as opposed to a mushy, pushing type of slack technique (typical of beginners)…when they feel the difference that I can make with my fingers, they really GET it! I don’t see how that can be conveyed as well via the online method. But for convenience of accessibility, the online method has some advantages I guess (traveling in winter). I also wonder how much I would enjoy feeding my lessons into a video camera rather than directly to the person. It’s unexplored territory for me.
Tim you bring up a good point. Everything I say and do is in direct response to the what the students play or say. The whole lesson is a 2-way communication. I imagine feeding a lesson into a camera would really just be a lecture.
Re: traveling in winter – the joy of teaching at home! Students come to me. It’s the parent’s decision whether to venture out. If they choose not to, I have a bit of free time
Thoughtful…and I’m a buyer of your POV.
Thank you for the affirmation, Dave. Always trying to find that balance…
Pingback: Living pianos | LaDona's Music Studio
Reblogged this on Laura Lamere and commented:
Read this music teacher’s views on technology and music lessons. It seems our kids may be missing out on a relationship with both the music and the teacher.